On the assassination of the United Healthcare CEO
On the one hand, there's the law which forbids killing people except in a very few situations, such as self defence. And Mr Thompson, the CEO, was a man with a working-class background who had worked himself up the ladder. He had a wife and children.
On the other hand, the law is far from perfect and isn't always on the side of what is ethically correct. United Healthcare made enormous profits from denying insurance claims from people who had paid their premiums and expected the company to honour their obligations. Mr Thompson seems to have personally been a champion of their practice of "deny, defend, delay" which has lead to thousands of personal bankruptcies, destroyed lives and early deaths.
In an ethical sense, can the killing be said to be an expression of class self-defence against the violence of the company?
I'm interested to hear everyone's thoughts.
For background:
Killing of Brian Thompson - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Last edited: