I've just increased the scope of the thread a bit - see new title It still has to be actual home computers though, i.e. not video game consoles!I couldn't afford a computer in the 80's, so I really can't contribute much.
I've just increased the scope of the thread a bit - see new title It still has to be actual home computers though, i.e. not video game consoles!I couldn't afford a computer in the 80's, so I really can't contribute much.
I've just increased the scope of the thread a bit - see new title It still has to be actual home computers though, i.e. not video game consoles!
Yea, I did it manually too. Did you use VisiCalc? I started with the DOS version of Lotus123.
Yes I think it was 4 MB now that you say that. My husband ended up getting lots of interesting external memory devices, so we could use the mac for quite a few years. And dialup!Ledboots, more likely 4 MB (swapping the 4 256 KB simms with 1 MB simms), unless you also added a 68020/68030 accelerator card.
I remember that upgrading from 1 MB to 2.5 MB (swapping 2 of the simms) already cost more than 500 $ ... 4 MB was the pure luxury, few people I knew did that.
Many of my peers replaced their C64s with the Commodore Amiga, which was also an amazing computer, but at the time it seemed like treason to me. So I stubbornly stuck with the C64 for years, until finally there was a good alternative to the Amiga, namely the 386 with VGA video cards which could do 640 x 480 in 16 colors or 320 x 200 in an incredible 256 colours.
And dialup!
The latter days of the C64 saw some amazing achievements, though - both artistically and in terms of programming.Ah, that explains my earlier confusion about your age. Most people I know were not as loyal as you and ended ditching (or, well, "shelfing", putting aside for possible later use) their C64s when the newer models with 68000 processor came out. But, I remember being really upset when my mother gave away my C64 that was still at home to somebody in the family wanting "some game computer", when I had actually already upgraded to the Atari ST, later the Macintosh and then even a Windows 386 machine (that was when Windows 3.1/3.11 Windows for Workgroups was launched, as the first somehow usable Windows version). Not that I would have used it again (I was missing the floppy), but still ... maybe one day ... how DARE she simply give it away.
Going back to Linux has been weighing heavily on my mind. How things with the popular distributions has been dumbed down frustrates me. I'd like to go back to something that's more hands on like the old days if I go back. I want to compile a kernel dang it!
It's amusing how far things have come. Sad too, the geek in me (or is that masochist?) feels that computers aren't near as much fun as they were when they weren't "user friendly". I remember times trying to achieve something on my server machine that would generally take days to figure out, ending up getting so engrossed in it the scenario would also be continued in dreams at night. Yep... Those were the days...
I completely disagree with this I want the desktop version of Linux to be slick and user-friendly, and to have the potential to become as popular as Windows and MacOS. If I want a challenge, there will always be the terminal, new server software to configure, and programming tasks to solve.How things with the popular distributions has been dumbed down frustrates me. I'd like to go back to something that's more hands on like the old days if I go back. I want to compile a kernel dang it!