Freesia
not my business.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2012
- Reaction score
- 7,866
- Lifestyle
- Other
Freesia: Post of the Week, quite possibly Post of the Month.
Thank you : ) .
Freesia: Post of the Week, quite possibly Post of the Month.
My point is that there is no gender inequity in protesting "Keep Calm and Rape" t-shirts, since men and boys can also be raped. In order to turn this into a gender issue you would have to ignore this, which everyone who wants to argue seems to be doing. Those t-shirts didn't say "Keep Calm and Only Rape Women". So I think it's fair to say that it is sexist to assume rape only applies to women, and that people who protest those shirts are only protesting raping women.
But it seems that some in this thread have the mentality that when gender-specific violence is advocated, we need to check *what* gender is the target before we disprove of it. They've bought into the cultural stereotype of the weak and the strong genders, and are too blind to notice it.
Well, don't be coy - name names.
Why not let the other posters judge for themselves?
All I'm doing is pointing out that as soon as one start buying into gender stereotypes, that person is part of the problem, not part of the solution.
Because I don't think anyone has made the assumptions that you're referring to, so it would be helpful if you pointed to specific posts/statements.
Perhaps it is me he is talking about . I think he is right, perhaps I had better check my privilege.
I have personally never had anyone throw stones at me as an adult, though I do remember in the playground as a child, a boy throwing a stone at me.
Perhaps it is me he is talking about . I think he is right, perhaps I had better check my privilege.
I have personally never had anyone throw stones at me as an adult, though I do remember in the playground as a child, a boy throwing a stone at me. He got into trouble with the teacher, but again it could easily be a girl who threw a stone at me, it is wrong to assume that the boy threw the stone because of his gender.
Anyway it seems that I am one of the lucky ones, and my only desire now is to give generously to charity. Some work has been done in the community here to close off access to quarries so nobody can illegally access gravel. But I think only a zero tolerance approach will work.
The entire experience left me conflicted for life. Men=evil? Men=saviours? I fear I will never resolve this internal conflict.
I think we all know how the thread was derailed.Lets not derail the thread, okay? Make another thread if you want to discuss this.
All I was doing was pointing out what appears to be an advocation of doing something bad to a person based on gender/race/religion/etc.
I think we all know how the thread was derailed.
I think we all know how the thread was derailed.
By freesia and her rocks.
I suspect that event was more traumatic than you have permitted yourself to realize.
When I was five, a boy threw stones ...errrr... gravel at me. He was my cousin, and even though he was only three, he was considerably larger and stronger than I. He had just gotten a new wagon and had filled it with stones ...errrr... gravel, and followed me around, throwing stones ...errrr... gravel at me, until the man who was to become my stepfather suggested we take a walk up a nearby hill. Pulling his heavily laden wagon, Christian fell further and further behind. It is suspected within the family that he was eaten by wolves that night.
The entire experience left me conflicted for life. Men=evil? Men=saviours? I fear I will never resolve this internal conflict.
How about we stop condoning legitimizing or minimizing the impact of violence due to gender of the person?
Hint: If you start to morally judge people based on gender, you've already made a huge mistake.
(I'm sorry, did I ruin your "humor"?)