Brian W
Conscientious Christian
What do you think the alternative is? Do they have the resources and manpower to keep all such animals?Again, this does not excuse their killing companion animals just because they can't find homes for them,
What do you think the alternative is? Do they have the resources and manpower to keep all such animals?Again, this does not excuse their killing companion animals just because they can't find homes for them,
That is one of the reasons I like to post new stuff in old threads. People will see the thread - maybe for the first time - in the What's New section. And read it from the beginning if they haven't visited it before.That’s ok…I do it sometimes, too, lol. I’ll “like” a post that I evidently missed somehow prior, only to find out it’s old, lol. I can’t figure out how to get the posts to show most recent posts first, so sometimes the page loads on the first page which is really annoying. If I don’t catch it right away I find myself liking or replying to old stuff.
What do you think the alternative is? Do they have the resources and manpower to keep all such animals?
...although I DON'T think this is an ideal situation.Re. pets and farm animals only: When we choose to keep animals, we choose to involve them in our system which means we have the responsibility to afford them all the care the sytem is designed to provide for all. Under such a system, a healthy being would never be killed and support should be available for the homeless. Re wild animals: I think that a human's ability to empathize compels any decent person to do what s/he can but there is often nothing that can be done in which case I hold a tentative view that it is best to let nature take its course.
What do you think the alternative is? Do they have the resources and manpower to keep all such animals?
No, they don't (at this point in time). I still don't see that an animal benefits from being killed, just because someone feels they must "do something". I actually think that maybe homeless pets would be better off if they were treated like wild animals, left to fend for themselves:
In some states there is no "pledge". the shelters vaccinate and sterilize the animals and the person who adopts the animal pays the bill....although I DON'T think this is an ideal situation.
I do understand that certain humans are/were ultimately responsible for domestic animals who have gone feral/homeless, and that this is not the case with wild animals. But are animal shelters responsible for this? For example, when I adopted my cats and rabbits from the local shelter, the contract I signed included a pledge to have them sterilized.
That's true. In my area, dogs aren't so much of a problem- but I live in a small city.That seems to be the strategy for cats. but I don't think it works for dogs. Dogs will tend to form packs and then get into all kinds of trouble.
I don't know if the size of the city is a factor. I think the most important factor is the Latitude.That's true. In my area, dogs aren't so much of a problem- but I live in a small city.
Stray dogs can be a huge problem. They will form packs, attack people and pets as well as whatever the local animal population is, and spread rabies and diseaseThat's true. In my area, dogs aren't so much of a problem- but I live in a small city.
While I understand what you are saying, I’m not sure I can agree with it. Or at least I can’t agree with the degree of not caring. It’s definitely easier adopting the “ostrich with it’s head in the sand” attitude but at the very least, we can care enough so that we do our part, however small, in helping to ease any suffering. I wouldn’t want to to be that uncaring so as to just ignore it all.I'm a black sheep among vegans. I couldn't care less about animals or animal rights cause I know it's something I can't change even if I wished to. Hell if we really want to go there the Africa is full of people suffering as this moment. There's so much suffering in this world that it's better to turn blind eye to it and live happily in your own bubble.
But as well as being an individual, you are contributing one way or another, either to the problem, or to the solution. There was a time when I didn't believe that fox hunting would ever be banned in the UK, despite the protests. Then it happened - or at least hunting with dogs was banned. We should have courage to do what we can and keep persisting. The vegan community is growing and is virtually mainstream now. In the seventies and eighties when I became interested in animal rights and the environment and human rights etc., even ovo-lacto vegetarianism was deemed a cranky hippy thing to do. By being vegan you are adding to the number of people who don't support the slaughter and therefore to the chances of reducing and, hopefully, eventually eliminating that slaughter.Of course I wont ignore everything all together. I want good for every living thing. But there's things one cannot simply change. It doesn't help the cattle if I feel bad for them, it only consumes my own strength. The only option I see would be going to protests. But lets face it, people are not going to change just because I feel bad about something and just because I want them to do so. Maybe one could change things by taking part to politics but I don't have the charisma it takes. So I choose to not care about anything but what I simply see directly in front of me. Yes I'm ignorant for my own happiness. I choose to do so without any guilt.
Gentle education and setting an example is the way to go IMO. It's slow but maybe more effective than being confrontational.I plan to go full vegan. Tho I don't feel like it's going to make much difference in grand scale. I do believe raising awareness is a good way to go. And on contrary trying to make people feel guilty through protests is just going to backfire and make people to go on the defensive.
Well the world is overpopulated with pets, there probably aren't enough homes for all of them, caring for them instead of euthanizing them would probably draw the financial resources of PETA away from its most important mission (promoting veganism & opposing factory farming); and... considering most dogs and cats aren't vegan... PETA would arguably be causing more animal suffering if they attempted to find homes for puppies and kittens instead of euthanizing them.I wish that were true. The reality is that Peta euthanizes nearly all the animals that comes through its doors, including healthy kittens and puppies. To be fair, it does encourage people who want to surrender healthy animals to go to a shelter instead, but like in most places, shelters are frequently full and can't take owner surrenders without a wait. Please google Peta and euthanasia and you'll find a lot of articles on their practices. FYI, they also support BSL - breed specific legislation - and would not support the rescue and rehabilitation of Michael Vick's rescued pit bulls.
I wish that were true. The reality is that Peta euthanizes nearly all the animals that comes through its doors, including healthy kittens and puppies. To be fair, it does encourage people who want to surrender healthy animals to go to a shelter instead, but like in most places, shelters are frequently full and can't take owner surrenders without a wait. Please google Peta and euthanasia and you'll find a lot of articles on their practices. FYI, they also support BSL - breed specific legislation - and would not support the rescue and rehabilitation of Michael Vick's rescued pit bulls.
Rick Berman is disgusting!PETA Kills Animals
just saw some news on this today. So I thought maybe it would be a good time to revisit it.
Full Disclosure: I'm a card carrying member of PETA.
And it was a Reddit post that inspired this.
We were talking about misinformation in another thread - the one about complete proteins. Sometimes misinformation is like the protein myth, not malicious, just unfortunate and accidental. And there is some that is sort of accidental or produced by negligence. I call it Lazy Reporting. Like the Moons thing. But sometimes it's purposeful and malicious. PETA Kills Animals is an example of the latter.
FYI, PETA Kills Animals is the name of an organization.
PETA Kills Animas is a front group operated by Berman & Co. Berman & Co. operates a network of dozens of front groups, attack-dog web sites, and alleged think tanks that work to counteract minimum wage campaigns, keep wages low for restaurant workers, and block legislation on food safety, secondhand cigarette smoke, drunk driving, and more.
PETA Kills Animals - SourceWatch
www.sourcewatch.org
Unlike selective-admission shelters (often misleadingly referred to as “no-kill” shelters), PETA operates what could be called a “shelter of last resort”—a safe place where no animal is turned away, ever.
Why PETA 'Kills' Animals and How PETA Helps Animals | PETA
Ever wondered about that "PETA kills animals" rhetoric? Does PETA help animals? Learn the truth about PETA's shelter and the animals euthanized there.www.peta.org
- There’s a considerable distinction between euthanizing and slaughtering animals. It’s contradictory for individuals who consume meat to express outrage about animal euthanasia while endorsing the widespread slaughter of animals
I would have come at him on his description of trans fats - which was misleading if not just plain wrong. but I like what Rachel did there too.Rick Berman is disgusting!
Ask some vegans about where they learned about eating vegan and many of them will say PETA. Maybe this isn't as true as it was 20 years ago. But 20 years ago I got my Free Vegan Starter Kit by sending a postcard to PETA. And now all you got to do is send them an email.I do wish they would broaden their advertising campaign, and more gently give people the needed information regarding nutrition, supplementation
and animal treatment on farms,
as well as softening their stance on total veganism.
The reason they go "over the top" is based on several thing. I'm not sure I even know them all but to my best understanding....When you go as 'over the top' as they sometimes have, you can just turn people off and earn accusations of spreading misinformation.