
Everything is politics, including NASA... its about what they spend the $ on...
In terms of the federal budget I've said a few times I'd like to invert the percentages for NASA and the military
Right now the military is very bloated, inverting would still give them some budget to use in order to grease the wheels while scaling down
If there was ever any real conflict that they dont already have everything they would need, they could request help from NASA...
Its ALWAYS about who gets the $
Of course Musk embarrassed NASA (or exposed some shadow thing... wheres all the $) with his reusable rockets...
50 million $ rocket only costs 200k $ in fuel to get to space...
The narrative is that NASA would continually make 50 million $ rockets, use them once and then make another
Do you believe that?
A question I've been pondering was if a space elevator was a good idea... pretty sure it would need to be a water elevator where you float things to the top, sandbags and 3d printing concrete and I bet that would be possible... lots of details, I feel like absorbing the energy on the way down is worth it, if you could spiral the tower and absorb with motors... anyways that sounds like way too much guesswork right?
Another question I was asking myself is if Branson and Virgin Galactic have the right idea, if he can get something as small as a jet to no gravity... doesn't it get easier once you get rid of the gravity? He just needs to start landing them in orbiting stations to refuel and go back to earth... idk, anybody have any important detail I'm not considering? it has the reusability and it fits with the other infrastructure and blablabla... Can a jet not be "electric"? Solar in space is suppose to be the gold standard right?
Last edited: