Lou
Forum Legend
Well, it's a slippery slope.
I think I recall you are reluctant to call yourself vegan because of your Vitamin D supplement.
I kind of think that is sort of sad. You are certainly vegan. How is being 98% vegan - not vegan enough.
I think people should be considered and consider themselves vegan if they are 98% vegan. But what about 97% or then if 97% is ok, what about 94%. *
I too call myself mostly vegan. About two years ago I made the decision not to worry about the details. The details were driving me crazy.
There is some areas that can drive any informed vegan a little nuts. The cultivation of Almonds and avocados harm bees. Palm oil cultivation harms orangutans. Non organic produce is bad for almost all living things.
This is where I fall back to the individuals intent and the vegan's society clause on "practical and possible". And since I'm not sure I meet the practical and possible requirement all the time then there is the mostly adjective to bail me out.
But you know, now that I am thinking about it. maybe that is not fair either. is vegan a binary state. like can you be mostly pregnant? Well... you can be almost dead.
Then again, I'm pretty sure it impossible to be IRL 100% vegan except in your intent. So full circle: its all about intent.
*How would you even calculate that. Dollars spent? calories consumed? Items in your frig?
I think I recall you are reluctant to call yourself vegan because of your Vitamin D supplement.
I kind of think that is sort of sad. You are certainly vegan. How is being 98% vegan - not vegan enough.
I think people should be considered and consider themselves vegan if they are 98% vegan. But what about 97% or then if 97% is ok, what about 94%. *
I too call myself mostly vegan. About two years ago I made the decision not to worry about the details. The details were driving me crazy.
There is some areas that can drive any informed vegan a little nuts. The cultivation of Almonds and avocados harm bees. Palm oil cultivation harms orangutans. Non organic produce is bad for almost all living things.
This is where I fall back to the individuals intent and the vegan's society clause on "practical and possible". And since I'm not sure I meet the practical and possible requirement all the time then there is the mostly adjective to bail me out.
But you know, now that I am thinking about it. maybe that is not fair either. is vegan a binary state. like can you be mostly pregnant? Well... you can be almost dead.
Then again, I'm pretty sure it impossible to be IRL 100% vegan except in your intent. So full circle: its all about intent.
*How would you even calculate that. Dollars spent? calories consumed? Items in your frig?