Clairey
Vegan wannabe
Daily Telegraph February 2005 Hungry foxes start eating the nations cats. Google that if you are able to.I can't find any information about this online. Do you have any links? Where does your information come from?
Daily Telegraph February 2005 Hungry foxes start eating the nations cats. Google that if you are able to.I can't find any information about this online. Do you have any links? Where does your information come from?
The only thing that would surprise me about this would be if they didn't mention the other things that can kill cats if they go outdoors- mainly, but not necessarily limited to, motor vehicles. My parents had 7 cats. I barely remember the first one, whom they got when I was about 4 and died from some illness soon after; I don't think they even had this one long enough to give them a name. Of the other 6 (5 of whom were outside frequently) two were definitely killed by cars. I found a third laying dead beside the house one night, bleeding from the mouth; we assumed she was hit also. The second cat they adopted came home one night with a bad wound on his throat and died within a year; in retrospect, I think he might have been infected with feline leukemia. So 4 of their 5 "frequently outdoor" cats had their lives cut short.The Next Door website was on the subject of foxes taking peoples pet cats. It is a community webpage. I am not with it any more but just remembered where i had seen it.
It was not just one or two people saying they had that experience it was common place.
I just tried googleing it and there was not anything on the subject but i know what i read and those people knew that was what was happening.
Consider: Elephants and Rhinoceroses have no significant predators... and yet, they do not generally overpopulate and ruin the ecosystem. African lions, North American brown bears, Orca whales, and eagles have no significant predators (other than humans)- yet, they don't overpopulate. I believe that most herbivores reproduce so prolifically in the first place because of predation pressure.Killing predators will ruin the ecosystem so many places. The nature is best being left alone, with no interference of human being. Some animals are carnivore, we need to live and accept that.
To kill pretators means litterally wiping out so much of the animals that are on this planet. And that's not even vegetarian, vegan or etihical in any way. It's no difference between killing a deer than a wolf, even though you put into some justice in your thoughts with "well, then the deer wouldn't be eaten by the wolf".
I googled it and could find nothing except this:Daily Telegraph February 2005 Hungry foxes start eating the nations cats. Google that if you are able to.
Fox “attacks”, usually minor bites, on people are extremely rare and, generally speaking, foxes are not a threat to humans. The number of attacks on cats and dogs each year is unknown, but seem to be of only minor significance relative to attacks on each other (i.e. dog on cat, or cat on cat). Typically foxes and cats ignore one another and fights are rarely observed.
In February 2005, the Daily Telegraph carried the headline “Hungry foxes start eating the nation’s cats” and the accompanying article told how fox attacks on cats were on the increase and quoted a pest controller near Edinburgh who explained that the fox population has gotten out of hand because the introduction of wheelie bins has deprived foxes of their regular food supply. As we have discussed already, there is no evidence of this, so if the number of fox attacks on cats has increased (or is increasing) it seems the reason lies elsewhere.
There are few data sets to tell us how many cats are attacked by foxes each year, not least because positively identifying the culprit as a fox (as opposed to a small dog, for example) is difficult. Probably the most off-cited statistics on the subject come from Bristol University. Stephen Harris distributed 5,480 questionnaires asking about fox disturbance, including losses of pets to houses in an area of north-west Bristol estimated to be home to 1,225 pet cats. Harris received 5,191 (95%) completed surveys and calculated that eight (less than 1%) of these pet cats, most being kittens less than eight months old, were thought to have been killed by foxes.
In our area, coyotes have moved into suburbia, and frequently take cats and small dogs. Bobcats and even raccoons can kill small pets.
I do wish people would keep their cats inside, as the songbird population has struggled fir years....
The Bristol research is out of date.
There are stories also about foxes going in peoples houses and hurting people, sometimes they go in through a window.
There was another big cat sighting near the Wiltshire border on the A303 in the last few days.These innocent creatures have no other alternative as their natural habitat lacks food and water. It's up to us human beings to protect
our pets as coyotes and bobcats hunt for food. That's what they do in the wild so their habits will not change when they end up in suburbia.
There was another big cat sighting near the Wiltshire border on the A303 in the last few days.
Theres been sightings of them over the years since Mary Chipperfield's Circus were said to have released 2 or 3 animals in Devon in the 1970's.I hope that it's safe and sound. Any large animal near a busy road is a danger to the public and itself.

All the creatures eat each other for some strange reason. Humans included. I do not know if that is how God meant it to be. Ido not think removing the human beings would make any difference, the animals would still carry on eating each other.Humans are the worst predators of all and kill the most animals. If you remove humans nature will eventually balance itself again and billions of animals will be saved. It's kind of ironic and hypocritical that a human wants to kill other predators to save animals.![]()
Veganism is very much limited to human interactionVeganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals.
I'm not saying humans are above animals and are rulers over them. I'm saying animals get a free pass because they are amoral. It's just like a juvenile getting a free pass for some of their actions while adult humans do not have that privilege either by logic or even legally. I'm saying humans need to be careful of their actions, because their actions(and by extension their character) could be classified as good or evil. And so humans who do evil are lesser in the moral ladder than amoral beings.If I were to state one commonality of vegans it would be that humans are not above other animals.
The idea veganfortheanimalss sees is placing humans as rulers of all life and antithetical to vegan objectives
Veganism is very much limited to human interaction
This might be one reason some people are hostile to the notion of animals having rights in general, or to veganism: they take this is a statement that humans are nothing more than animals. Frankly, there are some animals I've known who WERE better people than some humans I've known (specifically, two individual humans). But the rest of the humans I've known have generally acted more civilized and compassionate than many of the animals.If I were to state one commonality of vegans it would be that humans are not above other animals.