I agree with your point that words convey hidden meanings and views every time we use them. Using the very term "animal" puts them in an inferior position, and implies that we humans are the boss of the world, who choose to show benevolence and kindness to animals, at our mercy can these poor dimwitted creatures live on.
While biologists may use "animals" and "humans" merely as a way of distinguishing between different species, when used in everyday language it has the effect of continuously drawing the boundary between humans and animals, this becomes solid in our mind that even when we act out of goodwill towards them there can be a lingering sense of superiority influencing our behavior, which doesn't feel morally right.
If I may coin a word: "being" seems like a neutral word that signifies equality, we are human beings, animals are other living beings, we're all conscious beings. This puts an emphasis on what we share in common: consciousness
While biologists may use "animals" and "humans" merely as a way of distinguishing between different species, when used in everyday language it has the effect of continuously drawing the boundary between humans and animals, this becomes solid in our mind that even when we act out of goodwill towards them there can be a lingering sense of superiority influencing our behavior, which doesn't feel morally right.
If I may coin a word: "being" seems like a neutral word that signifies equality, we are human beings, animals are other living beings, we're all conscious beings. This puts an emphasis on what we share in common: consciousness
Last edited: