- Joined
- Jul 11, 2012
- Reaction score
- 102
What has the Pope done that makes any of them worthy of any kind of admiration? Some celebrities get singled out for not having talent(Kardashian, Oprah, porn stars, etc.). What talent does the Pope have?
I think that most people have some kind of talent. Oprah certainly does, look at the empire she has built. And people like to talk to her.
Also, porn stars have talent, some more than others. Having scripted sex in front of people is not easy, and having sex whilst looking like you're enjoying yourself is even more difficult. Some of the bigger names in porn are quite good at social media, among other things.
This thread makes me think the Pope has done little good for humanity. They do a lot of talking(rarely about the important things though) but when it comes to actions they rarely do anything. Just another human being that deserves as much fame as I do.
Distractify | I Knew Pope Francis Was Good, But When I Found Out Everything He Did in 2013, I Was Blown AwayThis thread makes me think the Pope has done little good for humanity. They do a lot of talking(rarely about the important things though) but when it comes to actions they rarely do anything. Just another human being that deserves as much fame as I do.
Oprah definitely has talent.
This thread makes me think the Pope has done little good for humanity. They do a lot of talking(rarely about the important things though) but when it comes to actions they rarely do anything
What makes sense, IMO, is to compare this pope to his predecessors (where I think he would possibly compare favourably to some, and possibly not so favourably against others
I'd love to hear about the talent they have.The idea that a person can rise through the ranks of a major religion with no talent is utter nonsense.
I'd love to hear about the talent they have.
Have any of them ever tried to address population size or animal rights to their followers?
[Pope] John [Paul XXIII] did establish a small commission for the Study of Problems of Population, Family, and Birth, which his successor, Paul VI, expanded to 58 members. Its job was to study whether the pill and issues such as population growth should lead to a change in the church's prohibition on all forms of contraception (other than abstinence during periods of fertility—the "rhythm method"). The commission was led by bishops and cardinals, including a Polish bishop named Karol Wojtyla, the future Pope John Paul II. (The Polish government did not allow Wojtyla to attend meetings.) They were assisted by scientists, theologians—including Protestants, whose church had ended its own opposition to contraception three decades earlier—and even several lay couples. One of them, Patty and Patrick Crowley from Chicago, carried letters and stories from Catholic women worn out by multiple pregnancies, medical problems, and the financial burdens of raising large families. The commission deliberated for two years, amid much anticipation from the faithful.
Then, in 1966, Paul VI's birth control commission presented its preliminary report to the pope. It held big news: The body had overwhelmingly voted to recommend lifting the prohibition on contraceptives. (The former Archbishop of Brussels, Cardinal Leo Suenens, went so far as to say the church needed to confront reality and avoid another "Galileo case.")
Catholics rejoiced, and many began using the pill at once. But their hopes were dashed when, in July 1968, Paul VI released an encyclical titled Humanae Vitae ("on human life"), reaffirming the contraceptive ban. It turned out that three dissenting bishops on the commission had privately gone to plead with the pope: If the position on contraceptives was changed, they said, the teaching authority of the church would be questioned—the faithful could no longer trust the hierarchy.