- Joined
- Jul 11, 2012
- Reaction score
- 102
Most poor would still have food stamps, all would have cheap health insurance, and I don't believe in foreign wars so they wouldn't be suffering from that either.So you'd cut funding for the poor, and they'll be better off?
Decades ago we should have cut immigration altogether, and could have kept our population below 200,000,000. Making a peaceful transition to the post-fossil fuel age was possible under these circumstances. Today with a population of maybe 320,000,000 and counting, that seems very unlikely. The rich, middle, and poor all benefit from keeping our population low, and they all suffer if we don't.