This could be falling back on semantics But I'm not happy with the Least Harm thing.
No Harm? Zero Harm. Well what ever we call it that's what I'm for.
I know, I know, you're going to say that is unrealistic and unachievable.
Not if you put in qualifiers. I'm going to use the Vegan's Society's definition as inspiration.
No intentional deaths and just what is practical and possible.
However, I have no intention to say this to a Carnist and get into an argument. So it doesn't really help
@Graeme M with his problem.
