beancounter
The Fire That Burns Within
if the lottery was run so that all the money that was put in was turned to prizes, then over millions of years the return for each dollar you spent on it would be returned. 1 for 1. I mean you wouldn't lose any money.
In the UK a big chunk is taken out for spending on causes, and some for running the thing, so a return on one pound might be 30pence, I don't know exactly.
The whole point of a lottery (or gambling in general) is for the people running the game to make money. Passing it out on a 1:1 ratio would be a very ineffecient means of wealth distribtion, and would provide no incentive for anyone to run said lottery, because the administrative cost would have to be absorbed by some third party in order to achieve a 1:1 payout.