beancounter
The Fire That Burns Within
I see that you haven't done your research.
United States Department of Justice did a report called "Firearm Use by Offenders".
That report is at least 15 years old. Do you have a current source?
I see that you haven't done your research.
United States Department of Justice did a report called "Firearm Use by Offenders".
The weapons used in Newtown were purchased legally by a citizen who was murdered and then had her guns stolen and used in a horrific crime.
From the NY Times on the law school shooting:
''There were pools of blood all over,'' Chase Goodman, a 27-year-old student, said in describing a scene punctuated with screams and gunfire.''When I got there there were bodies laying everywhere,'' said Dr. Briggs, who arrived at the first emergency alarm. Two victims suffered point-blank wounds ''execution style,'' one doctor at the scene said.Mr. Odighizuwa was subdued by three law students who were experienced police officers, the authorities said.''We're trained to run into the situation instead away from it,'' said one of the three, Mikael Gross, 34, of Charlotte, N.C., who ran to his car for his bulletproof vest and service pistol before tackling the suspect.Mr. Gross said that when he returned to the building he saw the gunman strike Ted Besen, another former officer, in the head. Mr. Gross said that he and another former officer, Tracy Bridges, then tackled the man. http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/17/us/3-slain-at-law-school-student-is-held.html
The Pearl High shooter was headed to his car to the Junior High School to kill more kids when he was stopped by an armed teacher, which I am sure your wiki link mentions.
That report is at least 15 years old. Do you have a current source?
I think that's a great example of how your own weapons can be used against you.
Letting a lawsuit go forward may not sound like a big deal, but Congress enacted a law in 2005 — under heavy lobbying from the NRA and the gun industry — that gives gun manufacturers and dealers broad immunity from being sued. The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) shields the gun industry even when it makes guns that are unnecessarily dangerous and sells them recklessly.
15 year old source isn't the best, but its better than speculating based on our gut feelings.
Do you have any indication that the means of acquiring weapons has drastically changed in the past 15 years?
In 15 years a lot can change. For example, when that study was made, the Internet wasn't a significant factor in gun sales.
My impression from accidental gun deaths is that its mostly people who are acting like idiots. While I think it wouldn't be a bad idea to have weapons that would clearly indicate if they are loaded, and the state of the safety, in the grand scheme of things, I doubt it would prevent most accidental gun deaths. Accidental gun deaths are a small fraction of total gun deaths (homicide or suicide are about 98% of all gun deaths). Swimming pools are a bigger risk, yet nobody appears to be calling for increasing liability on pool manufacturers.
The PLCAA isn't about accidental gun deaths. Its purpose is to prevent firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable for crimes committed with their products.
You might be familiar with dram shop liability, pursuant to which an establishment selling drinks to someone to the point of inebriation can be held liable for personal injury/death caused by the drunk person. The point of the PLCAA was to prevent people from suing if a dealer sold a gun to someone who could reasonably be expected to commit a crime with the gun.