Thank you very much for making the article more understandable.
Very sorry, but at the moment I still understand this is right:
But it isn't?
So this is wrong?
Sorry again for my bad understanding.
Yes, of course, OK, I actually thought that. Is this a very general statement or is there a connection to something I said?
Would you ever, really, think of eating a half cup of ground flaxseeds?
Here is the whole statement-
"Okay, but what about a little over nine tablespoons—that’s over a half-cup at a time—and that does start skirting toxicity. And finally, what about a whole cup? I don’t even know how you’d eat a whole cup at once, but that
is too much, putting you in that potential toxic range for about three hours.
So much for the industry’s eight-cups-at-a-time-are-safe. But even in this worse-case scenario situation, one cup raw on an empty stomach at the highest dose they could find, that person
still didn’t actually have any clinical symptoms. This is consistent with the fact that there’s not a single published report of cyanide poisoning after consumption of flax seeds anywhere in the literature, even from Swedish health spas, where they evidently give up to 12 tablespoons as a “fibre shock.” Usually, high doses are two or so tablespoons three times a day, and this dose would be “safe with respect to possible acute toxicity of cyanide.”
So at a half cup of ground flax it begins to enter the worrisome range of toxicity, but no clinical symptoms.
I was speaking in general, but it does seem to worry a lot about foods. I can't tell if just an interest, or obesession