You're misunderstanding.
Books that aren't eBooks should be referred to as books, not paper books.
Why are people ignoring the vast amount of free ebooks?
I'm not sure what the problem is even if eBooks are expensive. As interest increases, prices will decrease.
Also there seems to be an oligopoly in the ebook market with Amazon and Barnes & Noble being the overwhelminly dominant players, which could keep prices artificially high indefinitely.
Yeah, the future of physical books (like with vinyl) is going to be pretty much exclusively collectible. It's already almost there. I worked in the book business for a significant amount of time and saw the changes. I could give you all a lesson on the changes in the past 20 years and how the internet has essentially killed the used book trade but I'm lazy. I love physical books, but am not opposed to e-books either.
In a way, absolutely. However the current book trade on the internet is not set up for long term sustainability.IME, the used book trade is alive and well on the internet
I've never read an eBook. That probably won't change until such time as my eyes can so much more readily read a book on screen than on paper as to justify paying the high cost of ebooks. (Currently, I use the library extensively, and with respect to those authors and books that I know I will re-read, I buy the books used, online. I can almost always find them, in good to new condition, for under $5, including shipping.)
On my phone alone I have Les Miserables, On the Origin of Species, The Bible (for reference), Lovecraft's complete works, The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes (which I believe is like half of the total work of the series), and Dracula. I have more on my iPad, such as a couple H.G. Wells classics. Didn't pay a penny for any of them.