Tom L.
Forum Legend
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2012
- Reaction score
- 4,743
- Location
- New York State capital district
- Lifestyle
- Strict vegetarian
Hi, Jamie.
I'll want to think a bit about your posts above before addressing them maybe. In the meantime, here's where I'm coming from: because of my care for animals, I stopped eating meat when I was 16, and fish when I was 20. I think it was about 20 years ago when I became aware of what the dairy and egg industries do to animals, and started cutting back on dairy and egg. I'm not currently vegan because I still use "byproducts" of animal slaughter which vegans do not use (such as shoe leather); I don't see that a boycott of those things would change anything for animals because they're not raised or killed to meet market demand for them.
About your argument above:
Besides, as Andy_T's second post above points out, livestock animals aren't born into a vacuum: many wild animals are displaced (either killed, or prevented from existing) by the animals people raise for human consumption.
I'll want to think a bit about your posts above before addressing them maybe. In the meantime, here's where I'm coming from: because of my care for animals, I stopped eating meat when I was 16, and fish when I was 20. I think it was about 20 years ago when I became aware of what the dairy and egg industries do to animals, and started cutting back on dairy and egg. I'm not currently vegan because I still use "byproducts" of animal slaughter which vegans do not use (such as shoe leather); I don't see that a boycott of those things would change anything for animals because they're not raised or killed to meet market demand for them.
About your argument above:
I'm not sure my reason for not eating animals or their body products has much to do with this. My view is that animals enjoy their lives- and to kill them before their time is to do them harm, even if they are killed painlessly. But this isn't comparable to not causing an animal to be born in the first place. Before an animal is conceived, there is no individual to miss out on anything- so if my not eating meat, egg, or dairy causes the livestock industry to raise fewer animals than it would have, I still don't see it the same way as if I were to cause an already-existing animal to be killed.It's the argument that without our meat eating, the animals would not exist at all. Some vegans discuss this argument rather abruptly in articles and books in even a single sentence, which surprises me. One argument is that a bad life is better than no life. But I am not so sure about that. It just seems to be a philosophical debate that is too hard to resolve.
Besides, as Andy_T's second post above points out, livestock animals aren't born into a vacuum: many wild animals are displaced (either killed, or prevented from existing) by the animals people raise for human consumption.