It always amazes me when people assume that a candidate who can't win his party's nomination would somehow win the the general election. That's some magical thinking right there.
But enough with the personal attacks, let's look at issues instead.
View attachment 19964
But we had this earlier, did we not?
View attachment 19965
If winning the party nomination was democratic, I would agree with you. It is not, though. They go through all of these democratic-looking charades, but then just pick the one the party elite wanted anyways. Bernie had a larger fan base than Hillary, so at least statistically had a better chance of winning. Doubt he would have carried the extra electoral votes, though. Seriously, we need direct elections. This electoral college process has literally subverted the whole point of democracy for 2 of the 3 presidents this century alone.It always amazes me when people assume that a candidate who can't win his party's nomination would somehow win the the general election. That's some magical thinking right there.
Here is an interesting article:
Trump Beats Biden
The Democratic Party establishment has united behind the candidate who has failed at running for president for 32 years. Defender of banks and drug companies, Joe Biden is the swamp creature of Donald Trump’s dreams.jacobinmag.com
Keith A Spencer said:Now, to add to this qualitative assessment, there is quantitative evidence, too — reaped from studying hundreds of thousands of interactions online — that reveals the Bernie Bro myth as, well, a myth. Jeff Winchell, a computational social scientist and graduate student at Harvard University, crunched the numbers on tweet data and found that Sanders' supporters online behave the same as everyone else. Winchell used what is called a sentiment analysis, a technique used both in the digital humanities and in e-commerce, to gauge emotional intent from social media data.
"Bernie followers act pretty much the same on Twitter as any other follower," Winchell says of his results. "There is one key difference that Twitter users and media don't seem to be aware of.... Bernie has a lot more Twitter followers than Twitter followers of other Democrat's campaigns," he added, noting that this may be partly what helps perpetuate the myth.
Thanks for shilling for trump. If you need any more pointers from trump, you can get them here: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/10/trump-biden-clinton-age-senile-124797TBH, what frightens me even more recently (as in ... the last couple of days) is the amount of articles mentioning that Biden is almost never seen on TV, and the reason might be that he could be suffering from dementia, as suggested by some of this statements
It's not as if Dump would not already eat him alive in a debate, even at the height of his cognitive abilities...
Clinton won 55.2% of the popular vote in the 2016 Democratic primaries. Sanders won 43.1%. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primariesIf winning the party nomination was democratic, I would agree with you. It is not, though. They go through all of these democratic-looking charades, but then just pick the one the party elite wanted anyways. Bernie had a larger fan base than Hillary, so at least statistically had a better chance of winning. Doubt he would have carried the extra electoral votes, though. Seriously, we need direct elections. This electoral college process has literally subverted the whole point of democracy for 2 of the 3 presidents this century alone.
So is this, about the dirtbag left, who are loud and proud and very public: https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiED9yjmf-I8Q-WrikxLidaugqGAgEKg8IACoHCAowlOzSATCaiDUw1aKsBQ?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:enThis is interesting!
There is quantitative evidence disproving the "Bernie Bro" myth
A computational social scientist's study shows Bernie's Twitter followers act pretty much the same as everyone elsewww.salon.com
Clinton won 55.2% of the popular vote in the 2016 Democratic primaries. Sanders won 43.1%. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries
Please explain to me how Sanders had the "larger fan base", and how "giving" the nomination to Clinton was undemocratic, when she not only won the popular vote, but did so with a twelve point spread over Sanders?
Did I ... just write I was most concerned that Joe Biden had dementia?
That was before I read this article about all the things he had supported when he had full mental clarity ...
Democrats, You Really Do Not Want To Nominate Joe Biden
We urgently need to remember who Biden is and think carefully about what would happen if he were chosen.www.currentaffairs.org
Now, I am not so sure anymore ...
A majority of white men with a college degree in Missouri supported Biden on Tuesday night, a group that Sanders won by nearly 30 percentage points, 64 percent to 36 percent, in the 2016 primary. Among whites overall, Biden led by double digits, a reversal from Sanders' nine-point lead in 2016.
Black voters delivered yet another commanding win for Biden in the South, where he swept on last week's Super Tuesday. Nearly two-thirds of primary voters in the state of Mississippi were black, and they said they supported Biden by a more than six-to-one margin, with around 8 in 10 saying they voted Biden vs. only a little over 1 in 10 for Sanders.