In many places vegan food is available in prisons, hospitals, schools...
But c'mon, there would be Huge Pushback if it was mandated.
I doubt if there would be a public outcry if we banned meat commercials. although some media might resent the loss of revenue. And I'm sure Fox News would act like we had just killed their mother.
And as I have mentioned in numerous other posts there is no reason to tax meat. Again the public outcry fueled by Fox News would be intense. However, the entire livestock industry benefits from subsidies. Congress would not have to enact any kind of new taxes - they would just have to eliminate or reduce the subsidies. In fact, if done correctly it could be sold as a money saving policy.
Subsidies to the livestock industry came close to 10 Billion last year. Ten years ago it was only half that. As a start we could just go back to the levels in 2010.
Without subsidies some estimate that the cost of meat would double.
The Department of Agriculture has spent almost $50 billion in subsidies for livestock operators since 1995, according to an EWG analysis.
www.ewg.org
The Distracting Notion of Meat’s Impact on the EnvironmentAt this fall’s “Climate Crisis” town hall forum on CNN, Democratic front-runner Senator Elizabeth Warren dismissed the idea of reduced meat consumption as a simple distraction: “This is exactly what the fossil fuel industry hopes we’re...
jia.sipa.columbia.edu