I'm in a fairly left-leaning state (New York). Even though I live in upstate New York, not New York City, my area is still liberal... so in a way, I welcome something like Fox News for balance.The Telegraph is indeed very biased and right wing and pro-conservative, as is the Daily Mail, even though the latter is less explicitly political.
However we have the even more laughably biased and anti-conservative Daily Mirror to counteract things at the other end of the scale. The Guardian and Independent are also left leaning. Oh, and see your location says England. OK, I guess you already know this. Well, just for the benefit of others then.
I remember visiting the US one of the first times years ago and tuning into the hotel TV and Fox News came on. I just sat there in a daze, I honestly couldn't tell at first if I was watching some sort of spoof channel or if it was real. I was amazed because in the UK we have nothing as biased as that, it was hard to even believe. Pure propaganda.
I think US is worse for biased TV (although I largely base this on Fox News) and the UK is worse for newspapers.
I can't see Trump actually getting elected. Even though he enjoys a certain amount of popularity, would enough people actually VOTE for him? I'm not saying it's impossible, but...Yeeeeah! Go Trump go! Make America Great Again!
I kid, I kid... But he's still better than slime ball extremist tea bagger Cruz, or Mr. Roboto Rubio.
I'm in a fairly left-leaning state (New York). Even though I live in upstate New York, not New York City, my area is still liberal... so in a way, I welcome something like Fox News for balance.
I can't see Trump actually getting elected. Even though he enjoys a certain amount of popularity, would enough people actually VOTE for him? I'm not saying it's impossible, but...
I have no idea, Tom. I wouldn't vote for him. But then again I've never voted for a Republican, and don't foresee it happening any time in the foreseeable future that is for sure.
You know... it would be really wild if it turned out to be a presidential race between those two.Results from the nation's first primary:
New Hampshire votes: What's happening now
Sanders and Trump are called as the winners.
You know... it would be really wild if it turned out to be a presidential race between those two.
There's mostly only one viewpoint on vv, so it's easy to be civil when the only ones posting on it agree with each other
Hillary Clinton seems to have learned nothing from last night’s spanking in New Hampshire. Given that she lost every demographic except seniors, one would think that team Clinton would be putting its prodigious war chest into wooing the young (where the young count as anyone under 64). And yet this morning found this ad framing the AOL mail login page:
Does no one at the Clinton campaign know that AOL's mail users are predominantly people who signed up back in the days of telephone modems and software on CDs? There are probably more people who voted for Clinton in New Hampshire than there are millennials using AOL for their email in the entire country.
No, only in a few places as far as I know. It's a long border.I would like to know why Trump keeps going on about building a wall. I thought there already was a huge fence between the US and Mexico...
It's a long article but worth reading to the end. For me, it explained things very well, but I'm not an expert in economics, so I admit, I might be missing something important that was left out.
Dear Bernie: I Like You, But These Red Flags Are Too Frequent to Ignore