Calliegirl
Forum Legend
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2012
- Reaction score
- 5,816
- Lifestyle
- Vegan
I'd venture to say that both (Sean and Roger) are elderly gentlemen nowadays and their 60's (or 70's respectively) charme might not hit today's nerve
Roger has the more fancy gadgets going for him (the high-tech device from "From Russia with Love" was the famous attache case containing a tear gas grenade that explodes if opened wrongly)
Hy Shyvas,
I was referring to the epoch their charmes were most fashionable
Sean was at his best in the 1960's (which is about 50 years ago now)...
View attachment 6220
... while Roger had all the tech gadgets and cool from the 70's.
View attachment 6221
Best regards,
Andy
However, there was one scene that seemed dubious to me. I don't know that I can talk about it without it being a "spoiler," though.
This was the scene in which Wardaddy shoots/executes an unarmed German soldier/POW, who is begging for his life. It is my understanding that this sort of thing did not happen. Why not? Because the Germans had captured many American soldiers and held them as POWs. We did not mistreat the German POWs so the Germans would not mistreat the American POWs. This was the policy of the US during WWII.
In the aftermath of the Malmedy massacre, a written order from the HQ of the 328th U.S. Army Infantry Regiment, dated 21 December 1944, stated: No SS troops or paratroopers will be taken prisoner but will be shot on sight. Major-General Raymond Hufft (U.S. Army) gave instructions to his troops not to take prisoners when they crossed the Rhine in 1945. "After the war, when he reflected on the war crimes he authorized, he admitted, 'if the Germans had won, I would have been on trial at Nuremberg instead of them.'"Stephen Ambrose related: "I've interviewed well over 1000 combat veterans. Only one of them said he shot a prisoner... Perhaps as many as one-third of the veterans...however, related incidents in which they saw other GIs shooting unarmed German prisoners who had their hands up."