I wasn't talking about the motives - I was talking about the consequences and how it's unclear that they were more bad than good.
I don't think that justifies the invasion, however. In fact, even if the consequences were now uniformly agreed to be more good than bad (which is certainly not the case) you could still say the invasion was immoral. There seems to have been, as far as I can tell, a mix of motivations from ensuring access to oil to Bush Jr getting Saddam for his Daddy mixed in with the desire to remove a dictator. So sure, the motives were not at all clean.
The other thing that's noteworthy is that the Iraqi people were not consulted. It ought to be possible for Western governments to find a way of surveying the people discreetly to see if they agree or not with an invasion to remove a dictator, but this never takes place. Imagine if the US had conducted a survey of 1,000 Iraqis using telephone calls and street surveys and then published the results showing that a majority of people agreed with a US invasion to remove Saddam, that might have been a different story. Of course, there are a number of difficulties with such an approach, but they are not insurmountable, and it's telling that the West never does this kind of thing.
Also, thanks for telling me about Elon not qualifying for President. I meant to double check that before posting, actually, but I forgot. That may rule him out of politics altogether I suspect. He's probably too much of a big head to ever settle for a lesser political position