I have found that Internet headline writing is different from print headline writing. As a newspaper copy editor, the aim of headlines was to summarize, as accurately, objectively and cleverly as possible, what a story was about. Internet headlines seem designed to maximize clicks, regardless of their accuracy, objectivity or cleverness, because clicks mean money. I would like to think this headline was a ploy to get some Orange Menace supporters to read a story they might otherwise skip. They seem to reflect their guy by being the gloating type, so they might assume a march was canceled due to lack of interest, and thus would take great pleasure in seeing the opposition fail.I'm seeing essentially the same short news headline all over the internet; "Chicago March cancelled." It's well known that a lot of people only look at the headlines and don't read the actual stories. But you have to open the story and read it to learn that, while the MARCH was cancelled, the rally still went on. It seems to me like an attempt by the MSM to downplay the fact that the March was cancelled because thousands more people than expected showed up, and not, say, from a lack of interest, and that they still had a rally.