I liked some of the comments.Love this guy
Pretty much all of the smaller towns are Republican in CT, but the bigger cities make CT blue most of the time, though the state has had Republican governors over the years.For every Harris/walz sign there are five Trump signs. CT is supposed to be a blue state but you'd never know it from where I live.
To make myself feel better I tell myself that Harris/walz people just aren't as in your face about who they support.
I saw five new signs yesterday!!For every Harris/walz sign there are five Trump signs. CT is supposed to be a blue state but you'd never know it from where I live.
To make myself feel better I tell myself that Harris/walz people just aren't as in your face about who they support.
Two comments to thatOne observation I consider interesting … the amount of right-wing stuff I have been getting exposed to on « X » (formerly known as « Twitter ») recently is off the charts.
To me, it looks very much as if « X » was bigly using its **** right now, but I don’t know how it would look to an easily impressionable American voter….
NoThere's a vice presidential debate scheduled for 1. October on CBS News. How do you think this will play out?
Is Vance the more energetic candidate of the two, and will he somehow be able to present Trump's policies and talking points as something more reasonable-sounding?
probably. I suppose it all could be an act to appeal to a certain type of voter but I think he will just continue on the path he has created,Or will his radical side reveal itself as he blurts out awful things that will be off-turning to even Trump-leaning voters?
YesIs Walz up for the job? He almost seems like too decent a man to take on a slime-ball like Vance, but he's had some great talking points, including the framing of Trump's policies as "weird". So maybe? Or maybe Vance will just shoot himself in the foot, so Walz doesn't have to do much?
I agree.(I think Vance is a slime-ball based on his initial never-Trump stance which somehow morphed into licking Trumps boots to get his endorsement for the Senate seat and then more boot-licking to get the VP nomination, and along the way he seems to have betrayed the demographic he originally championed. But what do I know.)
I haven't seem many signs for either candidate. I have been seeing some support being shown for the district and congressional guys, whose names I sometimes don't recognize. Those I more often just pay attention to the primaries. Once they are on the ticket I just vote Blue straight down.For every Harris/walz sign there are five Trump signs. CT is supposed to be a blue state but you'd never know it from where I live.
To make myself feel better I tell myself that Harris/walz people just aren't as in your face about who they support.
On Meet the Press Vance was questioned on whether rump should retract his support for robinson.Just reported that Mark Robinson might cost Trump North Carolina, and the election.
Not sure if I find this ironic or poetic justice or well... as you sow....