das_nut
Forum Legend
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2012
- Reaction score
- 579
Why did you quote the post if it's not the one to which you were responding?
I thought ledboots was responding to me. Perhaps I made the same error that s/he did.
Why did you quote the post if it's not the one to which you were responding?
I thought ledboots was responding to me. Perhaps I made the same error that s/he did.
Even the article linked to in the op, which has been removed, and was the Wikipedia article, discussed it in humans, not other animals. They said from studying animal models they think they know what causes it, but animal models means inducing it in a laboratory setting. Not that I want to go looking it up, but I wonder just how prevalent it is in other animals besides human ones anyway. It may be non-existent in animals not found in laboratories.I meant that the article I posted was about human anencephalic infants. I assume it would be similar in animals, and if they lived after birth, they wouldn't live long enough to grow big enough to be a successful meat animal.
Yes, this is right. I don't always quote posts if there are no other posts in between.I'm pretty sure that her post #74 was in response to your post #73 - she was informing you about the physical condition of anencephaly as it6 presents in humans, being careful to point out that what she was quoting was written with respect to humans. There would undoubtedly be physical parallels in non-human anencephalic individuals.
I should just stop reading it, that would be the sensible thing to do.Would people prefer this thread to be closed?
I'm making a request to be exempted from the general consensus.